Attendance for people with no office
Phone check-in at the outlet, with the location recorded. The field force stops being a gap in the attendance data.
Fast-moving consumer goods are goods that are consumed rapidly and replaced frequently. The HR problem that comes with them is four workforces in one company: a plant on shifts, depots on despatch times, a field force who are never in a building, and a head office that runs on none of it.
None of these is exotic. They are the things that go wrong in the same week every month, in most FMCG companies, for the same reasons.
A sales officer covering a beat is at eighteen outlets and no office. Biometric attendance was designed for a door, and there is no door. So the field team ends up on a WhatsApp message or a register somebody fills in on Friday for the whole week.
Season doubles the plant headcount for eight weeks. The contractor supplies the people; you carry the compliance. When an inspector asks for the register, "the contractor has it" is not an answer that ends the conversation.
Professional tax differs by state and changes without much notice. Add separate PF codes per entity and a depot that opened in a new state last quarter, and payroll is a week of somebody's life.
A field team travels every day, so every one of them has a claim every month. They come in on chat, in an envelope, and in a spreadsheet, and finance chases the missing ones until the 12th.
Field and depot roles turn over fastest. Those are also the roles where onboarding is least documented, so every exit takes knowledge with it and every replacement starts from nothing.
Headcount by depot, overtime at the plant, cost per region. The data exists in four places and the answer takes two days, by which time the meeting has happened.
Shift rosters, overtime, and contract labour that doubles at season. On-roll and off-roll staff in one register, so the compliance question has one answer.
Teams who work to despatch times rather than office hours. Attendance, leave and overtime that fit a 6am start and a peak that lands on the last three days of the month.
Check-in at the outlet from a phone, expense claims from the same phone, and a record of who covered which beat. The population every other HR system handles worst.
Ordinary office HR for the people who run the rest: leave, appraisals, documents and reporting that reads across all four groups without an export.
One system for the plant, the depot, the field and the office, rather than one tool per population and a spreadsheet holding them together.
Phone check-in at the outlet, with the location recorded. The field force stops being a gap in the attendance data.
Patterns, rotations and cover, planned once rather than rebuilt every week on a whiteboard.
PF, ESI, professional tax and TDS worked out per state and per entity, with the filings coming out of the same place.
Contractor-supplied labour recorded alongside your own, so the compliance answer does not depend on a phone call.
Submitted from the phone, approved by the regional manager, and in payroll before the cut-off rather than after it.
Field and depot roles turn over fastest, so the pipeline has to keep running. Applicants, interviews and offers in one place.
Payslips, leave balances and policy answered without a call to the regional HR person, who is usually driving.
Headcount, overtime, attrition and cost by depot, region or entity, read from one set of records.
A new sales officer has a first week that is planned rather than improvised, which is most of what keeps them past month three.
A sales officer, a packing operator, a depot loader and a brand manager need different things from HR and the same employee record. This is where that record lives.
Professional tax by state, PF and ESI by entity, overtime from the roster and claims from the field, all resolved in the same cycle.
Payslips, leave balances, reimbursement status. Nearly all of them have an answer already in the system, and nearly none of them need a person.
Field and depot roles are the ones you are always hiring for. The pipeline has to run continuously rather than in bursts.
A sales officer is measured monthly and usually finds out where they stand at the review. Putting the target and the progress in the same place they already check their payslip changes that.
Not everything benefits from automation. These are the places in an FMCG HR team where it removes real work rather than adding a dashboard.
Payslip, leave balance, claim status, policy, holiday list, PF number. Across a few thousand people that is a full-time job, and it is the first thing to hand over.
A field team submits thousands of receipts a month. Pulling the amount and the date off them is work nobody should be doing by eye.
A sales officer vacancy pulls hundreds of applications. Ranking them against what the role actually needs is where the days go.
A beat marked covered from the same location every day is worth a look. Finding it by reading a report is not realistic.
Attrition in field roles has patterns: months of service, region, manager. Surfacing them is cheap and acting on them is not.
Offers, confirmations, transfers and warnings, built from the record rather than from the last one somebody edited.
No percentages here, because we have not measured yours. These are the changes customers describe first.
Growing businesses. Run hiring, attendance, payroll and records from one place without adding an HR team to do it.
Large organisations. Depth across entities, locations and approval chains, without a year-long rollout to get there.
Workforce across borders. Country rules, local policies and one headcount everybody reports the same way.
A regional manager sees their region. A depot supervisor sees their depot. Salary stays with the people who need it.
Who changed a record, when, and what it was before. Kept from the first day rather than added when somebody asks.
PF, ESI, professional tax, TDS and gratuity, maintained as the rules change rather than configured once.
Where your records sit, who can reach them, and what happens to them when a contract ends.
Login through your own identity provider, with joiners and leavers synced rather than remembered.
Payroll output to finance, headcount to the ERP, without a person exporting a file on the 30th.
What FMCG HR and operations teams ask before moving off spreadsheets.
FMCG stands for fast-moving consumer goods: goods that are consumed rapidly and replaced frequently. Food, beverages, personal care, household products and over-the-counter medicines are the usual examples. The business runs on volume and speed, and that shapes the HR problem: large numbers of people across plants, depots and the field, with high turnover in the roles closest to the customer.
The one that handles your field force properly, because that is where most HR systems fall down. What to check: attendance that works on a phone away from any office, multi-state payroll with professional tax by state, a register that covers contractor-supplied labour as well as your own, and expense claims that reach payroll before the cut-off. A tool that only does office HR will leave you running the field team on a spreadsheet anyway.
From their own phone, at the outlet, with the location recorded against the check-in. That answers the question a beat plan actually asks, which is whether the visit happened, rather than the question a biometric machine answers, which is whether somebody walked through a particular door. Nothing has to be installed at the outlet.
Yes, and it is one of the reasons to have a system at all. Contractor-supplied workers are recorded in the same register as on-roll staff, with their documents and their attendance against them. When headcount doubles for a season and an inspector asks for the register, the answer does not depend on ringing the contractor.
Yes. Professional tax rates and slabs differ by state and change, and PF and ESI are held per entity. All of it is worked out during the run and the filings come from the same place. Adding a depot in a new state is a configuration change, not a new payroll process.
The person who took the photograph of the receipt submits it from the same phone. It goes to their regional manager to approve, and an approved claim lands in the payroll cycle rather than in an inbox. For a field team where everybody claims every month, that is the difference between finance chasing and finance reconciling.
Weeks rather than months, and it depends almost entirely on how clean your existing records are. The sensible order is one location live first, usually a smaller depot, so the mistakes are cheap. What you learn there makes the second site faster and the fourth one uneventful.
No. The ERP runs the goods and the ledger; this runs the people. The two need to talk rather than overlap, so payroll output reaches your general ledger and headcount reaches the ERP through an API rather than through a monthly export.
Plants, depots, the field force and head office on one system, with the statutory work handled state by state.